Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42828577›Full record

ReviewJournal of robotic surgery2026

Perioperative management and challenges of robotic-assisted surgery: a narrative review.

Yongjie Xu, Xinqiang Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yongjie XuDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Huzhou Normal University (Huzhou First People's Hospital), Huzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Xinqiang WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Huzhou Normal University (Huzhou First People's Hospital), Huzhou, Zhejiang, China. ddwxq218@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past two decades, robotic surgical technology has become increasingly widespread worldwide. RAS (robotic-assisted surgery) has attracted surgeons across various specialties with its advantages of high precision, a shorter learning curve, and reduced postoperative pain, while also imposing new requirements on the entire surgical team, including anesthesiologists. The physiological changes and unique complications associated with RAS have brought major challenges for anesthesiologists, who should respond rapidly to patient responses throughout the entire procedure.This review focuses on the potential issues encountered in the perioperative management of RAS, as well as the application of RAS across several specialties and the specific intraoperative management challenges involved.

Indexed as

Perioperative CareRobotic Surgical ProceduresHumansIntraoperative ComplicationsPostoperative ComplicationsAnesthesia, GeneralComplicationsExtreme trendelenburg positionIntraoperative complicationsPatient safetyPerioperative managementPneumoperitoneumPostoperative complicationsRobotic‑assisted surgery

Identifiers

PMID42828577
PMCPMC13634019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.