Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42828571›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026

Symptom relief does not fully reflect functional adaptation after lumbar decompression: longitudinal changes in lifting biomechanics following surgery for degenerative lumbar stenosis.

Ram Haddas, Ye Shu, Mark Lawlor, Alexander Akoto, Ashley Rogerson, Andrew Megas, Paul Rubery, Varun Puvanesarajah

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ram HaddasDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, USA. Ram_Haddas@URMC.Rochester.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1273-5499
Ye ShuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4359-1393
Mark LawlorDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, USA.
Alexander AkotoDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, USA.
Ashley RogersonDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, USA.
Andrew MegasDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, USA.
Paul RuberyDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, USA.
Varun PuvanesarajahDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLumbar decompression effectively reduces pain and disability in patients with degenerative lumbar stenosis (DLS); however, it remains unclear whether symptomatic improvement is accompanied by restoration of functional movement during activities of daily living. This study evaluated longitudinal changes in lifting biomechanics and neuromuscular activation following lumbar decompression.

methodsThirty-eight patients with symptomatic DLS underwent three-dimensional motion analysis and synchronized surface electromyography during a standardized symmetric lifting task approximately one week before surgery and again at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. Patient-reported outcome measures (ODI and PROMIS) were collected at each visit. Mixed-effects linear regression models evaluated longitudinal changes in kinematics and muscle activation.

resultsLumbar decompression produced significant improvements in disability, physical function, pain interference, and mood within three months that were maintained at six months. Despite these improvements, objective movement patterns continued to change through six months, with persistent biomechanical and neuromuscular adaptations. Postoperatively, patients demonstrated greater trunk and lumbar flexion, reduced frontal and transverse plane lower-extremity motion, and altered neuromuscular activation characterized by increased external oblique activity and shorter activation durations of the rectus femoris and gluteus maximus, whereas persistent adaptations remained in the tibialis anterior and erector spinae. Patients lifted heavier loads after surgery without significant changes in task completion time, indicating improved quality of movement rather than faster task performance.

conclusionsFollowing lumbar decompression, improvements in patient-reported pain and disability were accompanied by longitudinal changes in lifting biomechanics and neuromuscular control; however, these objective adaptations remained evident through six months. These findings suggest that symptomatic improvement and objective functional adaptation represent complementary but distinct dimensions of postoperative recovery. Objective biomechanical assessment may therefore provide clinically relevant information beyond PROMs by characterizing how patients adapt movement strategies during recovery.

Indexed as

Activities of daily livingDegenerative lumbar stenosisFunctional recoveryLifting biomechanicsLumbar decompressionMotion analysisNeuromuscular reorganizationObjective functional assessmentPrecision rehabilitationSurface electromyography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.