ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2026
Prevalence of chronic conditions among children and adolescents-register data and self-reports.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to estimate the prevalence of chronic health conditions (CHCs) among children and adolescents in Denmark using data from national population registers and survey data from self-reports. The data originated from two sources: (1) the Danish national registers and (2) two nationally representative surveys. A 20% random sample of all children born between 1994 and 2013 (N = 263,864) was drawn from the Danish national registers and included records of in- and out-patients in public hospitals, in primary health care or indicated prescriptions. Self-reported health conditions were obtained from the two nationally representative surveys (N = 70,534). Chronic conditions were classified by experienced clinicians across the range of physical and mental health conditions in the International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10). In the register data, the overall prevalence of CHCs increased with age in both sexes, from 9.3% to 14.6% among 1-10-year-olds and from 18.3% to 22.0% among 11-20-year-olds, mainly due to an increased frequency of mental disorders with age. The prevalence of self-reported CHCs was 28.4% among 11-15-year-olds, 14.6% of whom reported being affected in their daily lives. Among 16-20-year-olds, the prevalence of self-reported CHCs was 34.2%, and 15.3% reported being affected in their daily lives.
conclusionThe inclusion of both register-based and survey data allowed the study to capture different groups of children and adolescents. Furthermore, the choice of method used to estimate the prevalence of CHCs depends strongly on the data source, the case definition, and the context of the healthcare system. WHAT IS KNOWN: • The prevalence of chronic health conditions (CHCs) found among children and adolescents varies due to methodological variability and use of definitions. • Using national registries, this study has explored the prevalence of physical and mental health conditions across all ICD-10 diagnoses among children and adolescents referred to a hospital. WHAT IS NEW: • In the register data, the prevalence of CHCs varied between 9.3% and 18.3% in the child population; in the youth population, 22% were diagnosed with a condition classified as chronic. • Self-reported data from 11-15-year-olds and 16-20-year-olds showed prevalences of 28.4% and 34.2%, respectively, including CHCs not necessarily exceeding the threshold of clinical referral.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42828548What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.