Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42828407›Full record

ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2026

Automated Large-Scale Extraction of Nanotoxicity Data from the Literature Using Multimodal Large Language Models.

Seung-Geun Park, Seung Min Ha, Zayakhuu Gerelkhuu, Tae Hyun Yoon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Seung-Geun ParkDepartment of Chemistry, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3787-0999
Seung Min HaDepartment of Chemistry, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6603-4707
Zayakhuu GerelkhuuResearch Institute for Convergence of Basic Science, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5132-2703
Tae Hyun YoonDepartment of Chemistry, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2743-6360

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Manual curation of nanotoxicity data remains a major bottleneck in the scalable construction of large datasets because key physicochemical and toxicological variables are often distributed across text, figures, tables, captions, legends, and Materials and Methods sections. Here, we developed a multimodal large language model (LLM) workflow for automated extraction and structured curation of nanotoxicity data from research articles. Four multimodal LLMs were benchmarked on curated set of 17 oxide nanotoxicity articles. GPT-5.4 provided the best balance between extraction accuracy and efficiency, achieving a mean extraction F1 score of 96.1% and an assay results F1 score of 86.5% on the main benchmark. The optimized workflow was then applied to 821 articles, generating 16,786 structured records and substantially reducing the manual recovery of figure-derived quantitative data. Automated machine learning (AutoML) modeling showed that the physicochemical (PChem) score-filtered subset achieved higher overall predictive performance, whereas record-count balancing among the 4 most represented materials reduced performance. Models trained only on records for ZnO, TiO

Identifiers

PMID42828407
PMCPMC13632934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.