ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026
Multicenter Study on the Surgical Treatment of Suprascapular Nerve Entrapment Syndrome.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Suprascapular nerve entrapment syndrome is a rare but increasingly recognized cause of shoulder pain and dysfunction, particularly among young or middle-aged men involved in overhead sports or physically demanding occupations. The suprascapular nerve, primarily motor but also containing sensory fibers, may become compressed due to anatomical variations, ossified ligaments, or space-occupying lesions such as paralabral ganglia. Diagnosis is challenging due to nonspecific symptoms and overlapping pathologies and often relies on clinical evaluation supported by electromyography (EMG) and magnetic resonance imaging. Methods: Between 2008 and 2018, a total of 10 patients (8 men, 2 women; mean age 31.1 y) with suprascapular nerve entrapment underwent open surgical decompression. All patients experienced chronic shoulder pain unresponsive to conservative treatment. Surgical exposure followed a scapular spine incision, allowing visualization and decompression of the nerve at the suprascapular notch and infraspinatus fossa. Follow-up (mean 15.4 mo) assessed pain (visual analog scale), muscle strength (Medical Research Council Scale), and EMG findings. Results: Most patients had delayed diagnosis (mean 7 mo). At follow-up, all but 1 showed significant pain reduction during exertion (mean visual analog scale score from 4.2 to 2.7) and improved strength (mean Medical Research Council Scale score from 2.6 to 4.2). EMG demonstrated normalization in 6 patients, partial recovery in 3, and persistent myogenic changes in 1 case, possibly due to neuralgic amyotrophy. Conclusions: Open surgical decompression proved to be an effective treatment for suprascapular nerve entrapment, particularly in cases unresponsive to conservative therapy or associated with secondary compression.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.