Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42828373›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Mechanical Ventilation Practices in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review of Contemporary Evidence.

Maqdad Taaqi, Shareefah Almutairi, Roza Bahwaini, Waqas Alauddin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maqdad TaaqiPhysiology, Health Sciences Center - Kuwait University, Kuwait City, KWT.
Shareefah AlmutairiPhysical Therapy, Health Sciences Center - Kuwait University, Kuwait City, KWT.
Roza BahwainiRespiratory Therapy, Chest Diseases Hospital, Kuwait City, KWT.
Waqas AlauddinPhysiology, Venkateswara Institute of Medical Sciences, Amroha, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) frequently necessitates mechanical ventilation to maintain adequate gas exchange, protect the airway, and support cerebral physiology during the acute phase of critical illness. Although ventilatory management is an integral component of neurocritical care, the optimal approach remains uncertain because interventions aimed at pulmonary protection may influence intracranial dynamics and neurological outcomes. This systematic review aimed to critically evaluate contemporary evidence on mechanical ventilation practices in adults with TBI, with emphasis on ventilatory strategies, lung-protective ventilation, airway management, tracheostomy, weaning approaches, and clinically relevant outcomes. A systematic literature search was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines using PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), EBSCOhost, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Google Scholar, and selected grey-literature sources for studies published from January 2000 through June 2026. Eligible studies included adult patients with TBI who were receiving mechanical ventilation and reported ventilation-related interventions or outcomes. Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklists, and the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool, as appropriate for the study design. Owing to substantial clinical and methodological heterogeneity, findings were synthesized narratively. Eleven studies, comprising randomized controlled trials, prospective and retrospective cohort studies, and cross-sectional surveys, met the inclusion criteria. Considerable variation was observed in ventilatory management, particularly regarding tidal volume, positive end-expiratory pressure, carbon dioxide targets, airway management, and tracheostomy timing. The available evidence suggests that individualized ventilatory management may help balance pulmonary protection with preservation of cerebral physiology when guided by appropriate neurological and respiratory monitoring. Early tracheostomy may be associated with shorter durations of mechanical ventilation and intensive care unit stay in selected patients, although consistent benefits in mortality or long-term neurological recovery have not been established. Overall, the included studies demonstrated substantial variability in ventilatory practices and clinical outcomes across different settings and patient populations. Current evidence suggests that ventilation strategies in adults with TBI should be tailored to individual respiratory mechanics and cerebral physiological status rather than applied uniformly. However, substantial heterogeneity, limited TBI-specific comparative evidence, and variation in clinical practice limit the certainty of the available evidence. High-quality multicenter studies are needed to establish evidence-based ventilatory targets and determine their effects on patient-centered neurological and pulmonary outcomes.

Indexed as

airway managementintensive carelung-protective ventilationmechanical ventilationneurocritical caretracheostomytraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID42828373
PMCPMC13632785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.