Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42828306›Full record

ReviewCurrent research in microbial sciences2026

From predicted bacteriocins to ecological function.

Samson Baranzan Wayah, Kensuke Arakawa, Koshy Philip

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current research in microbial sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Samson Baranzan WayahGraduate School of Environmental, Life, Natural Science, and Technology, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan.
Kensuke ArakawaGraduate School of Environmental, Life, Natural Science, and Technology, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan.
Koshy PhilipInstitute of Ocean and Earth Sciences, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome and metagenome mining have uncovered large repertoires of predicted bacteriocin loci, but ecological interpretation has lagged behind discovery. This review uses bacteriocins as a focused model for a broader problem in antimicrobial gene prediction: sequence identifies encoded potential, but it does not establish expression, product deployment, target engagement, or community-level consequence. We distinguish four forms of bacteriocin "silence": transcriptional silence, where loci are not detectably expressed under tested conditions; conditional silence, where expression or activity emerges only under specific environmental or social cues; phenotypic silence, where expression or product formation does not yield detectable activity in routine assays; and ecological silence, where activity is observed but its consequences for coexistence, exclusion, colonization, or community assembly remain unresolved. We also clarify how this framework extends previous reviews of bacteriocin diversity and microbiome-shaping roles by providing an inference-centered taxonomy that separates encoded potential from demonstrated ecological function. Finally, we propose a function-first roadmap for bacteriocin research, including condition-resolved transcriptomics and proteomics, promoter and cue-dissection experiments, expanded target panels, spatially structured assays, defined consortia and microcosms, producer/non-producer comparisons, and explicit tests of resistance, immunity, and fitness consequences. Treating predicted bacteriocin loci as hypotheses rather than conclusions will improve how the field moves from gene catalogs to causal ecological understanding.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial gene predictionBacteriocinsContext-dependent interactionsEcological functionGenome miningMicrobial ecology

Identifiers

PMID42828306
PMCPMC13632526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.