Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42828270›Full record

ReviewEuropean urology open science2026

PSMA PET/CT Kinetics During Systemic Therapy and Radiotherapy in Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Jennifer Le Guévelou, Matteo Bauckneht, Timo F W Soeterik, Matthijs Scheltema, Lorenzo Bianchi, Claudia Kesch, Giorgio Gandaglia, Pawel Rajwa, Rossella Nicoletti, Fabio Zattoni and 21 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European urology open science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors.

Jennifer Le GuévelouDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Tours, Tours, France.
Matteo BaucknehtNuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera Metropolitana, Genova, Italy.
Timo F W SoeterikDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Matthijs ScheltemaSt. Vincent's Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Lorenzo BianchiDivision of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Claudia KeschDepartment of Urology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Giorgio GandagliaUnit of Urology/Division of Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Pawel RajwaDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland.
Rossella NicolettiDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Science, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Fabio ZattoniDepartment of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology (DISCOG), University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Alberto MartiniDepartment of Urology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, USA.
Vittorio FasuloDepartment of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Veeru KasivisvanathanCentre for Urology Imaging, Prostate, AI and Surgical Studies (COMPASS) Research Group, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
Felix PreisserMartini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Centre, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Lara Rodriguez SanchezDepartment of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France.
Francesca AmbrosiniDepartment of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.
Ugo FalagarioDepartment of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Tamas FazekasDepartment of Urology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Alexander GiesenDepartment of Urology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Guido RoveraDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Italy.
Martina MaggiDepartment of Urology, ASST Santi Paolo E Carlo, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Chiara MercinelliMedical Oncology Department, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Milan, Italy.
Marcin MiszczykDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Juan Gomez RivasServicio de Urología, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Olivier WindischDepartment of Urology, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Hein StroombergUrological Research Unit, Department of Urology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Bernardino RuiGlickman Urological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, USA.
Ali BourgiDepartment of Urology, CHRU Tours, Tours, France.
Derya TilkiMartini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Giancarlo MarraDepartment of Urology, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Città della Salute e della Scienza and University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
EAU-YAU Prostate Cancer Working Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Context: Although prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is commonly used for both initial staging and restaging at biochemical recurrence for patients diagnosed with prostate cancer (PCa), its role in the evaluation of treatment response is currently not validated. Objectives: We aimed to identify studies that implemented PSMA PET/CT as a restaging modality for patients with hormone-sensitive PCa (HSPC) and highlight the evolution of PSMA PET/CT parameters to assess its potential use for treatment response evaluation. Evidence Acquisition: A systematic review was performed using the MEDLINE, Scopus, and Embase databases until December 2025. Studies deemed eligible were those reporting PSMA expression dynamics under either systemic therapy or after radiotherapy (RT). Evidence synthesis: A total of 11 studies were included, including two prospective single-arm studies and nine retrospective studies. Under androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), a decrease in PSMA expression was observed across all disease sites. In one prospective study, a flare phenomenon (increase ≥20% in tracer uptake) was observed at the lesion level in 26% of bone lesions and 11% of nodal and prostate lesions at 3-4 wk, with a median change in maximum standardized uptake value (ΔSUVmax) of +50% (interquartile range 32-72) in bone lesions showing flare. At 22 wk, one retrospective study reported mean SUVmax reductions of 48%, 59%, and 74% in prostate, nodal, and bone lesions, respectively. Other studies at different time points each reported reductions in prostate SUVmax ranging from 49% to 67%, with differences in whether estimates were summarized as means or medians. After RT, one retrospective study suggested that the reduction in prostate SUVmax may be more pronounced in patients receiving concomitant ADT (mean reduction -59% ± 25% vs -45% ± 31% for RT alone; Conclusions: PSMA PET-derived parameters hold the potential to personalize treatment strategies depending on treatment response. The relationship between changes in PSMA expression and oncological outcomes warrants further investigation in other studies.

Indexed as

Androgen deprivation therapyHormone-sensitive prostate cancerPositron emission tomography/computed tomographyPSMA expressionRadiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID42828270
PMCPMC13632124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.