ReviewCureus2026
The Three Cs of Integrated Tuberculosis-Diabetes Modules: A Competency-Based Medical Education Framework.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The introduction of Competency-Based Medical Education (CBME) in India emphasizes outcome-oriented training and provides a framework for implementing integrated teaching strategies. Traditional discipline-based medical education often limits the ability of learners to integrate knowledge across domains required to manage such complex comorbidities. Evidence suggests that integrated teaching approaches improve knowledge acquisition, clinical reasoning, and learner engagement. The coexistence of tuberculosis (TB) and diabetes mellitus (DM) represents a significant and evolving public health challenge, particularly in high-burden countries such as India. Diabetes increases the risk of developing active TB and is associated with adverse treatment outcomes, including delayed sputum conversion, treatment failure, relapse, and increased mortality. This bidirectional interaction necessitates an integrated approach to both clinical management and medical education for TB and DM. This review synthesizes existing literature on the epidemiological and clinical interplay between TB and DM, along with educational frameworks supporting integration. This review of literature additionally presents a curriculum innovation comprising structured aligned integrated teaching (AIT) modules that integrate TB and DM across the MBBS curriculum using both horizontal and vertical integration strategies. The proposed framework may serve as a practical model for institutions implementing CBME. Adoption of structured integrated modules may enhance undergraduate medical training and better prepare future physicians for managing TB-DM comorbidity in high-burden settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.