Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42828136›Full record

ArticleIntegrative organismal biology (Oxford, England)2026

"Am I Teaching into the Void?" Instructor Perceptions of Active Learning in Online Biology Courses.

Austin L Zuckerman, David Esparza, Yanwei C Liu, Michelle K Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Austin L ZuckermanDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
David EsparzaDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8458-4741
Yanwei C LiuDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Michelle K SmithDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7721-7417

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extensive studies and meta-analyses have shown that active learning in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics courses improve equitable learning outcomes compared to traditional lecture. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, most active learning studies focused on in-person instruction, but as online and hybrid teaching continues to be explored as a potential avenue to deliver course content to more students, the field is exploring the efficacy of active learning practices in online courses. Several studies have compared student course performance and affective dispositions toward active learning practices between online and in-person courses, yet there has been limited work examining experiences from the instructor's perspective. The future of online teaching is at a critical juncture as institutions decide whether and how to scale online biology instruction in ways that are sustainable for instructors while conferring positive learning outcomes for all students. In this study, we surveyed a national sample of higher education biology instructors who taught both in-person and online biology courses using active learning. This survey compares instructor experiences using active learning in their most recently taught online and in-person biology courses. We also asked instructors about insights into barriers and relative advantages of implementing active learning in online biology courses. Instructors perceived active learning to be aligned with their preferred pedagogical styles in both in-person and online courses, yet they viewed active learning implementation significantly more positively for their in-person courses. Instructors perceived that there was weaker departmental support and visible resources for supporting active learning in their online courses. The reported barriers for using active learning in online courses largely centered around student engagement and buy-in, and active learning strategies that worked better in the online courses were typically attributed to structural advantages of the activities in the online modality rather than pedagogical innovation. Informed by advice curated from the participant sample, we provide recommendations that focus on opportunities to improve active learning in online biology courses.

Identifiers

PMID42828136
PMCPMC13631680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.