ArticleJournal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques2026
Technical considerations of a physician-modified dual-fenestrated Gore thoracic branch endoprosthesis for total endovascular aortic arch repair.
Article in Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Total endovascular aortic arch repair is a less invasive option to both open and hybrid surgery for complex arch disease. Currently, the only U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved branched endovascular device for aortic arch repair in the United States incorporates a single-branch design, often necessitating adjunctive cervical debranching to achieve complete arch reconstruction. Although multivessel fenestrated and branched arch technologies are available in selected regions outside the United States, many remain investigational or are not broadly accessible because of regulatory or commercial limitations. In this context, we have selectively applied physician-modified endograft techniques in patients who are considered poor candidates for open total arch replacement or in whom cervical debranching required for zone 0 single-branch repair is associated with an unacceptably high operative risk or is anatomically unfavorable. Physician-modified endografts can be a valuable alternative in patients who are at high risk for open arch or complex cervical debranching. In this report, we detail the modification of a GORE Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis (W. L. Gore & Associates) with dual fenestrations, designed specifically for total endovascular repair of the aortic arch. Device modifications, procedural details, and bailout techniques are described.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.