ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2027
"Clinical outcomes of definitive interstitial/hybrid high-dose-rate and pulsed-dose-rate interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy) for non-melanoma skin cancer: A single-center retrospective analysis".
Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2027. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate clinical outcomes and toxicity of definitive interstitial or hybrid interventional radiotherapy (IRT; brachytherapy) using high-dose-rate (HDR) or pulsed-dose-rate (PDR) techniques for non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) unsuitable for standard superficial treatment. Materials and Methods: This retrospective single-center analysis included 49 patients with 50 histologically confirmed basal cell carcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma lesions treated between October 2020 and December 2023. Primary and recurrent lesions treated with definitive HDR- or PDR-based interstitial or hybrid IRT were included. Local control, acute reactions, late effects, and dosimetric parameters were assessed. Adverse events were graded according to Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria. Results: Basal cell carcinoma accounted for 37 lesions and squamous cell carcinoma for 13. Twenty-eight lesions were primary tumors and 22 were recurrences after surgery. Interstitial IRT alone was used in 35 lesions and hybrid IRT in 15; 30 lesions received HDR-IRT and 20 received PDR-IRT. Median follow-up was 21.2 months. Local control was achieved in 47 of 50 lesions (94%), and the estimated 2-year local control rate was 93.6%. Late grade 3 and 4 effects occurred in one and three lesions, respectively. Grade ≥ 2 late effects were associated with higher T stage ( Conclusions: The findings of this study support definitive interstitial and hybrid IRT as a valuable treatment option for selected patients with recurrent or locally advanced NMSC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.