Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42828099›Full record

ReviewiScience2026

Sequencing the wastewater virome: Current strategies and bioinformatic pitfalls.

Marie De Smedt, Wim L Cuypers, Noor Ul Hudda, Peter Delputte

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marie De SmedtLaboratory for Microbiology, Parasitology and Hygiene, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium.
Wim L CuypersAdrem Data Lab, Department of Computer Science, University of Antwerp, Middelheimlaan 1, 2020 Antwerp, Belgium.
Noor Ul HuddaLaboratory for Microbiology, Parasitology and Hygiene, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium.
Peter DelputteLaboratory for Microbiology, Parasitology and Hygiene, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wastewater-based surveillance (WBS) is a powerful tool for monitoring viral pathogens at the population level, complementing clinical surveillance through anonymous and unbiased insights into viral circulation. Wastewater sequencing allows to move beyond detection toward detailed characterization of circulating pathogens. This review outlines the two main sequencing strategies used in WBS: targeted and untargeted approaches. Targeted methods, including amplicon- and probe-based sequencing, provide sensitive detection and recovery of known viruses but are limited in identifying novel pathogens. Untargeted shotgun metagenomic sequencing offers a broader, unbiased view of the wastewater virome, although its performance is challenged by low human viral abundance, complex background signals, and genome assembly challenges. We also discuss key challenges complicating bioinformatic analysis, including limited human viral sequences, co-circulating viral lineages, viral dark matter, reference database limitations, large data volumes, and methodological biases, as well as emerging computational approaches aimed at improving wastewater sequencing analysis and interpretation.

Indexed as

bioinformatic analysismetagenomic sequencingsequencingtargeted sequencingviruseswastewaterwastewater-based surveillance

Identifiers

PMID42828099
PMCPMC13631625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.