Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42828075›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair With Collagen Patch Augmentation: An In Vivo Examination of Biologic and Biomechanical Patches.

Caroline Sumner, Srinath Kamineni

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Caroline SumnerOrthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, USA.
Srinath KamineniOrthopaedic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Evansville, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of patch augmentation in the setting of large-to-massive rotator cuff repairs and poor tissue quality may reinforce native tissue and add structural integrity, potentially decreasing retear rates. Many patches are currently marketed for this use, with research focusing primarily on easily observable surgical outcomes, including range of motion, pain, and functionality. These case reports investigate the use of two such patches, Regeneten (Smith+Nephew, Andover, MA, USA) and BioBrace ( CONMED, New Haven, CT, USA), observed at subsequent revision surgeries; this in vivo observation provides insight into the cellular effects of these patches, namely, the extent of healing and tissue proliferation. In case 1, Patient A received a Regeneten patch during initial repair; upon revision nine months later, staple fragments were found floating in the joint space, with no evidence of the previously placed patch except for bone anchors. In case 2, Patient B received a BioBrace patch during initial repair; upon revision five months later, the patch was found to be intact and well-integrated, with evidence of cellular overgrowth and neovascularity. These two cases, each a single point-in-time evaluation of a prior rotator cuff repair with patch augmentation, raise questions regarding a potential difference in the bioinductive properties of the two patches. Further large-scale studies are warranted to investigate the different bioinductive qualities of the patches and their role in the cellular healing process, as well as their unique complication risks.

Indexed as

biobracecollagen patch augmentationregenetenrevision arthroscopyrotator cuff repair

Identifiers

PMID42828075
PMCPMC13633079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.