ArticleJournal of cancer biology2026
Beyond a binary RTK-RAS biomarker: context-aware precision oncology in early-onset colorectal cancer.
Article in Journal of cancer biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) is increasing worldwide and represents a biologically and clinically heterogeneous disease that requires precision approaches extending beyond conventional single-gene biomarkers. Recent analyses of receptor tyrosine kinase-RAS (RTK-RAS) pathway alterations demonstrate that their clinical significance is strongly dependent on age at diagnosis, ancestry, and treatment exposure. In particular, RTK-RAS alterations have been associated with unfavorable survival in untreated early-onset non-Hispanic White colorectal cancer, while an opposite association has been observed in FOLFOX-treated late-onset disease. At the same time, overall RTK-RAS pathway alteration frequencies remain relatively stable across patient groups, whereas gene-specific differences involving ERBB2, NF1, FGFR2, NTRK2, and other pathway components reveal substantial molecular heterogeneity. These observations challenge the use of RTK-RAS alteration status as a uniform prognostic biomarker and instead support a context-dependent model in which genomic alterations interact with age-related tumor biology, treatment pressures, ancestry-associated factors, and broader molecular states. Emerging genomic studies further suggest that EOCRC may harbor distinct mutational processes related to earlier-life exposures, reinforcing the need to integrate pathway alterations with mutational signatures, tumor microenvironment features, and multi-omic information. Artificial intelligence-enabled platforms such as AI-HOPE, developed at the Velazquez-Villarreal Lab at City of Hope, provide a scalable strategy for interrogating these complex multidimensional relationships through rapid cohort construction and hypothesis generation, while maintaining conventional statistical and experimental validation as essential components of inference. Future studies incorporating diverse populations, detailed treatment histories, genomic ancestry, longitudinal sampling, and functional validation will be critical for determining whether context-specific RTK-RAS patterns can ultimately improve risk stratification and therapeutic selection in EOCRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.