Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42828039›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Recurrent Left Abducens Nerve Palsy and Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension During Pregnancy: A Diagnostic Challenge.

Tarun V Ramlogan, Aamir S Ali, Raenelle Ramlogan

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tarun V RamloganInternal Medicine, Sangre Grande Hospital, Sangre Grande, TTO.
Aamir S AliInternal Medicine, Sangre Grande General, Sangre Grande, TTO.
Raenelle RamloganInternal Medicine, Sangre Grande Hospital, Sangre Grande, TTO.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is characterized by elevated intracranial pressure without an identifiable mass lesion, hydrocephalus, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, or abnormal cerebrospinal fluid composition. Diagnosis during pregnancy can be challenging because headache and visual symptoms overlap with several neurologic and obstetric disorders. We report a previously healthy 20-year-old primigravida with a body mass index of approximately 33 kg/m² who presented at 17 weeks' gestation with intermittent headache, photophobia, blurred vision, horizontal diplopia, nasal deviation of the left eye, and absent left-eye abduction. Visual acuity was 6/6 bilaterally, with mild bilateral optic disc swelling, greater on the left. The initial brain magnetic resonance imaging report described subtle paired diffusion-weighted signal abnormalities in the region of the medial longitudinal fasciculi, interpreted as possible mild cytotoxic edema related to a potentially reversible ischemic event. These findings were not anatomically concordant with the documented isolated left abduction deficit, and subsequent informal radiologic review raised the possibility that they were artifactual; no formal radiology addendum was available. Magnetic resonance angiography showed no significant intracranial arterial abnormality, and magnetic resonance venography excluded cerebral venous sinus thrombosis. Lumbar puncture in the lateral decubitus position demonstrated an opening pressure of 31 cmH₂O with normal cerebrospinal fluid constituents, followed by resolution of her symptoms and abducens palsy after drainage. Symptoms recurred at 20 weeks, when repeat opening pressure was 42 cmH₂O; and they again improved after drainage. Acetazolamide was commenced at 250 mg twice daily and increased to 500 mg twice daily at 33 weeks because of persistent optic disc swelling. The patient underwent cesarean delivery at 36 weeks; the specific clinical rationale for the mode of delivery was unavailable in the records reviewed. The neonate weighed 2.6 kg, had Apgar scores of seven and eight, and had no documented neonatal complications. Acetazolamide was continued postpartum. At telephone review approximately six months after delivery, the patient remained clinically well, reported adherence to her prescribed acetazolamide, and denied recurrent headache, blurred vision, diplopia, or ocular deviation. Final objective ophthalmologic resolution could not be confirmed because she did not attend her most recent scheduled ophthalmology follow-up. This case emphasizes the need to integrate clinical examination, cerebrospinal fluid findings, and neuroimaging when evaluating intracranial hypertension during pregnancy.

Indexed as

abducens nerve palsyacetazolamidediplopiaidiopathic intracranial hypertensionlumbar puncturepregnancy

Identifiers

PMID42828039
PMCPMC13632791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.