Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42827957›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

A Multi-layer Linguistic Profiling Framework for Emotion Recognition in Text: A Data-Driven Natural Language Processing (NLP) Study Using the Kaggle Emotions Dataset.

Roaa S Bogdadi, Marivel M De Guzman, Rahaf Al Hasheem, Mohammad Bani Abed Alghani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Roaa S BogdadiResearch, King Abdullah Medical Complex, Jeddah, SAU.
Marivel M De GuzmanResearch, Research Assistant (RA) Company for Research and Studies, Riyadh, SAU.
Rahaf Al HasheemData Science/AI, Pioneers Academy, Amman, JOR.
Mohammad Bani Abed AlghaniData Science/AI, Pioneers Academy, Amman, JOR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Emotion recognition in text underpins a wide range of human-centered artificial intelligence (AI) applications, yet existing frameworks either prioritize accuracy at the expense of interpretability or analyze emotional language through a single lens. This study developed and evaluated the Multi-layer Emotion Linguistic Profiling Framework (MELPF), a reproducible protocol integrating lexical, structural, and model-level interpretability analyses to characterize how emotional meaning is encoded in short text. Methods The Kaggle Emotions Dataset (16,000 training, 2,000 validations, and 2,000 test instances; six emotion categories) was used. The corpus exhibits pronounced class imbalance: joy (33.5%) and sadness (29.2%) dominate, while surprise is underrepresented (3.6%); in addition, all statistics were derived strictly from training instances to prevent data leakage. MELPF operates across five stages: preprocessing; lexical profiling (unigram/bigram distributions, term frequency-inverse document frequency {TF-IDF}, pointwise mutual information (PMI), and co-occurrence analysis); structural profiling (part-of-speech {POS} distribution and template identification); supervised classification using logistic regression, a linear support vector machine (SVM), random forest, a bidirectional long short-term memory (BiLSTM) network, and Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) (base-uncased variant); and cross-layer synthesis via feature-importance mapping and attention visualization. Results BERT achieved the highest macro-F1 (the macro-averaged F1 score, i.e., the harmonic mean of precision and recall; 0.92, accuracy 0.93), followed by BiLSTM (0.89), linear SVM (0.88), logistic regression (0.86), and random forest (0.81). Ablation confirmed that PMI-derived and POS-based features improved macro-F1 from 0.88 to 0.89 over the TF-IDF baseline. Lexical profiling identified category-discriminative unigrams and high-PMI bigrams, while structural profiling revealed a dominant first-person copular frame. Feature-importance scores and attention visualization confirmed alignment between salient tokens and model decisions. Conclusion MELPF offers a transparent, reproducible methodology for examining emotional meaning across multiple linguistic layers, bridging theoretical linguistics and applied NLP.

Indexed as

emotion recognitionexplainable ailinguistic profilingnatural language processingtext classification

Identifiers

PMID42827957
PMCPMC13632572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.