ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Assessing toxic work environments in Türkiye: adaptation and validation of the toxic work environment scale.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Toxic work environments have emerged as an important organizational issue due to their detrimental effects on employee well-being, job attitudes, and organizational effectiveness. Despite growing interest in workplace toxicity, there is a lack of validated instruments available for assessing toxic work environments in the Turkish context. Therefore, the primary aim of this study was to adapt and validate the Toxic Work Environment Scale for use in Türkiye. The study was conducted using a two-sample design involving 392 employees. The adaptation process followed established translation and back-translation procedures to ensure linguistic and conceptual equivalence. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), internal consistency analysis, and test-retest reliability assessment were performed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the scale. The findings supported a stable one-factor structure consistent with the original instrument. The scale demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency and temporal stability, indicating that it is a reliable and valid measure of toxic work environments in the Turkish context. The validated Turkish version of the scale provides researchers and practitioners with a useful tool for assessing workplace toxicity and examining its relationships with employee well-being, burnout, turnover intentions, absenteeism, and other organizational outcomes. The study contributes to the literature by providing a culturally adapted instrument that may facilitate future research on toxic work environments in Türkiye.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.