Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42827926›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2026

Development and validation of machine learning models for predicting rehabilitation non-response after knee arthroplasty.

Niclas J Hubel, Ferdinand Prüfer, Walter Bily, David Schneider, Bernhard Holzner, Michael J Fischer, Vincent Grote

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Niclas J HubelAustrian Center for Medical Innovation and Technology, Wiener Neustadt, Austria.
Ferdinand PrüferDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Walter BilyLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Rehabilitation Research, Vienna, Austria.
David SchneiderVitrea Rehabilitation Center Kitzbühel, Kitzbühel, Austria.
Bernhard HolznerHealth Outcomes Research Unit, University Hospital of Psychiatry II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Michael J FischerLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Rehabilitation Research, Vienna, Austria.
Vincent GroteDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Structured rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) effectively improves health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and function, yet some patients fail to achieve minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs). Machine-learning (ML) based prediction models offer one way to identify those patients. We aim to develop and externally validate ML models to predict MCID-based non-response at discharge. Methods: Registry data from four Austrian rehabilitation centres ( Results: Models predicted non-response with good discrimination (AUCs: TUG 0.771, WOMAC 0.704, EQ-5D 0.770); and varying calibration (TUG: acceptable, WOMAC: good, EQ-5D: poor). Admission values were the most important predictors, with better values resulting in a higher likelihood of not achieving a MCID. Discussion: ML can predict MCID-based non-response after TKA rehabilitation using routinely collected admission data. Baseline status is a dominant driver, highlighting ceiling effects and the potential for bias, as well as the need for more precise outcome definitions and the search for suitable, independent predictors. Clinicians could use ML-based risk estimates to identify likely non-responders early, support personalized expectation management, and tailor therapy intensity or content. Translating these tools to practice will require prospective validation and integration into clinical workflows.

Indexed as

arthroplastyAutoMLhealth-related quality of lifeminimal clinically importance differencepatient-reported outcomesreplacement knee

Identifiers

PMID42827926
PMCPMC13630954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.