ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2026
Development and validation of machine learning models for predicting rehabilitation non-response after knee arthroplasty.
Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Structured rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) effectively improves health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and function, yet some patients fail to achieve minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs). Machine-learning (ML) based prediction models offer one way to identify those patients. We aim to develop and externally validate ML models to predict MCID-based non-response at discharge. Methods: Registry data from four Austrian rehabilitation centres ( Results: Models predicted non-response with good discrimination (AUCs: TUG 0.771, WOMAC 0.704, EQ-5D 0.770); and varying calibration (TUG: acceptable, WOMAC: good, EQ-5D: poor). Admission values were the most important predictors, with better values resulting in a higher likelihood of not achieving a MCID. Discussion: ML can predict MCID-based non-response after TKA rehabilitation using routinely collected admission data. Baseline status is a dominant driver, highlighting ceiling effects and the potential for bias, as well as the need for more precise outcome definitions and the search for suitable, independent predictors. Clinicians could use ML-based risk estimates to identify likely non-responders early, support personalized expectation management, and tailor therapy intensity or content. Translating these tools to practice will require prospective validation and integration into clinical workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.