Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42827925›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2026

Multichannel SSA decomposition in a hybrid SSA-N-BEATS framework for complex time series forecasting.

Alfian Adi Pratama, Putriaji Hendikawati

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alfian Adi PratamaApplied Statistics and Computing, Department of Mathematics, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia.
Putriaji HendikawatiApplied Statistics and Computing, Department of Mathematics, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forecasting high-resolution time series remains challenging because of nonlinear behavior, multiple seasonalities, and high-frequency noise. Deep learning architectures such as N-BEATS offer strong forecasting capability, yet their performance often deteriorates when trained directly on raw signals that mix multiple temporal characteristics. Hybrid frameworks integrating decomposition with neural networks offer a practical solution, though effectiveness depends on the stability of the underlying data. This paper benchmarks the N-BEATS (baseline) model against two Hybrid SSA-N-BEATS scenarios: Hybrid SSA-N-BEATS (denoising) and Hybrid SSA-N-BEATS (multichannel). In the denoising scenario, singular spectrum analysis (SSA) is applied solely for denoising, isolating deterministic signals before network training. In the multichannel scenario, SSA decomposes the series into trend and seasonal subsignals, each processed in parallel through an independent N-BEATS channel. The proposed evaluation protocol assesses model behavior across stable periods and periods marked by structural level shifts. This provides a systematic framework for identifying when decomposition-based hybridization is practically beneficial. This work makes the following methodological contributions:•Provides a decomposition-based benchmarking framework for forecasting complex time series.•Introduces both denoising-based and multichannel SSA-N-BEATS pipelines.•Demonstrates that hybrid model effectiveness depends on temporal stability and structural level shifts.

Indexed as

Deep learningHybrid frameworkN-BEATSSSATime series decompositionTime series forecasting

Identifiers

PMID42827925
PMCPMC13632226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.