ReviewFrontiers in chemistry2026
Solid electrolytes for practical all-solid-state lithium batteries: integrating ion transport, interfacial mechanics, and scalable manufacturing.
Review in Frontiers in chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
All-solid-state lithium batteries are increasingly viewed as a route toward safer and higher-energy rechargeable batteries, yet the transition from highly conductive electrolyte materials to practically competitive cells remains difficult. The central challenge is no longer simply to maximize bulk ionic conductivity. Solid electrolytes must simultaneously provide continuous ion-transport pathways, stable electrode contact, limited electronic leakage, sufficient mechanical compliance or fracture resistance, and compatibility with manufacturing processes that produce thin electrolyte layers and high-loading electrodes. This review examines solid electrolytes from this integrated materials-mechanics perspective. Oxide, sulfide, halide, nitride, polymer, and composite electrolytes are compared according to the relationship between transport behavior, chemical stability, mechanical response, interface evolution, and processability. Particular attention is given to contact loss, interphase formation, void generation, lithium penetration, and the role of external stack pressure. Recent progress in low-temperature ceramic processing, fluorinated sulfides and halides, structured composite electrolytes, and advanced polymer electrolytes illustrates how these traditionally coupled limitations can be partly decoupled. Manufacturing strategies including dry processing, thin electrolyte fabrication, melt infiltration, and pressure-efficient cell architectures are further discussed. Finally, practical electrolyte design is proposed to shift from optimizing isolated material properties toward balancing conductivity, thickness, interfacial stability, mechanical reliability, and scalable processing under realistic cell conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.