Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42827909›Full record

ArticleCurrent research in neurobiology2026

Context-sensitive V1 activity that depends on both coherence and surprise.

Zirui Zhang, Clement Abbatecola, Angus T Paton, Christiaan N Levelt, William A Phillips, Lucy S Petro, Lars F Muckli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current research in neurobiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zirui ZhangSchool of Psychology and Neuroscience, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QB, United Kingdom.
Clement AbbatecolaSchool of Psychology and Neuroscience, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QB, United Kingdom.
Angus T PatonSchool of Psychology and Neuroscience, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QB, United Kingdom.
Christiaan N LeveltDepartment of Molecular Visual Plasticity, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
William A PhillipsFaculty of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, FK9 4LA, United Kingdom.
Lucy S PetroSchool of Psychology and Neuroscience, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QB, United Kingdom.
Lars F MuckliSchool of Psychology and Neuroscience, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QB, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigate how information processing in the early visual cortex, which is tuned to the statistical regularities of sensory inputs, depends critically on the context in which those inputs occur. Neurobiologically inspired computational frameworks of visual processing emphasise functional interactions between higher and lower cortical areas, whereby higher areas with larger receptive fields send top-down (feedback) signals that contextualise bottom-up (feedforward) processing in lower areas. In this human fMRI study, we use visual scenes in which information was partially and temporarily occluded to test cortical processing in the corresponding retinotopic area within V1. By temporally varying the onsets of bottom-up (feedforward) sensory input in one quadrant of the visual field (the target area) and the onset of its surrounding context, we examined how consistent versus inconsistent surrounds influence the processing of bottom-up input to V1 before or after the arrival of feedback signals. We found that responses in the target region depended on both the consistency and the timing of the surround stimuli. Information in the surround increased the V1 BOLD response to the target compared with when the target was presented alone. However, when the target became temporally predictable by a consistent surround shown before the target, the response to the target neither increased nor decreased. We discuss our results in the light of how the neocortex transmits informative and coherent signals.

Indexed as

Cortical feedbackEarly visual cortexfMRIPredictive processing

Identifiers

PMID42827909
PMCPMC13632203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.