ArticleCurrent research in neurobiology2026
Context-sensitive V1 activity that depends on both coherence and surprise.
Article in Current research in neurobiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We investigate how information processing in the early visual cortex, which is tuned to the statistical regularities of sensory inputs, depends critically on the context in which those inputs occur. Neurobiologically inspired computational frameworks of visual processing emphasise functional interactions between higher and lower cortical areas, whereby higher areas with larger receptive fields send top-down (feedback) signals that contextualise bottom-up (feedforward) processing in lower areas. In this human fMRI study, we use visual scenes in which information was partially and temporarily occluded to test cortical processing in the corresponding retinotopic area within V1. By temporally varying the onsets of bottom-up (feedforward) sensory input in one quadrant of the visual field (the target area) and the onset of its surrounding context, we examined how consistent versus inconsistent surrounds influence the processing of bottom-up input to V1 before or after the arrival of feedback signals. We found that responses in the target region depended on both the consistency and the timing of the surround stimuli. Information in the surround increased the V1 BOLD response to the target compared with when the target was presented alone. However, when the target became temporally predictable by a consistent surround shown before the target, the response to the target neither increased nor decreased. We discuss our results in the light of how the neocortex transmits informative and coherent signals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.