ArticleiScience2026
Multimodal imaging reveals no evidence for magnetite-based magnetoreceptors in the mole-rat eye.
Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Magnetoreception is widespread across animals, but its sensory mechanism remains unresolved. One leading hypothesis proposes that single-domain magnetite is coupled to mechanosensitive ion channels. In subterranean Ansell's mole-rats, such receptors have been proposed to reside in the cornea or retina. We screened for magnetite in the mole-rat eye by combining iron imaging via enhanced Prussian blue staining and synchrotron X-ray fluorescence microscopy (XFM) with magnetic imaging via MRI-quantitative susceptibility mapping (MRI-QSM) and quantum-diamond microscopy. The retina and cornea contained little iron, most of which co-localized with titanium or chromium, indicating a non-biogenic origin. Iron-enriched lines in the cornea did not show ferrimagnetic signals. MRI-QSM revealed the highest susceptibility in the ciliary body, where iron-rich pigmented cells were identified. A targeted TEM-screen, however, failed to detect single-domain magnetite particles. In conclusion, we found no evidence of magnetite-based magnetoreceptors in the cornea or retina, suggesting other tissues or mechanisms underlie mole-rat magnetoreception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.