Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42827897›Full record

ArticleiScience2026

Multimodal imaging reveals no evidence for magnetite-based magnetoreceptors in the mole-rat eye.

Leif Moritz, Kamalika Nath, Ella P Walsh, Anna Sternberg, Elisabeth Becher, Adrian Lange, Gerald Falkenberg, Dennis Brückner, Clemens Diwoky, Kristian Bredies and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Leif MoritzResearch Group Neurobiology of Magnetoreception, Max Planck Institute for Neurobiology of Behavior - caesar, 53175 Bonn, Germany.
Kamalika NathResearch Group Neurobiology of Magnetoreception, Max Planck Institute for Neurobiology of Behavior - caesar, 53175 Bonn, Germany.
Ella P WalshSchool of Physics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3010 VIC, Australia.
Anna SternbergDepartment of General Zoology, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45141 Essen, Germany.
Elisabeth BecherResearch Group Neurobiology of Magnetoreception, Max Planck Institute for Neurobiology of Behavior - caesar, 53175 Bonn, Germany.
Adrian LangeResearch Group Neurobiology of Magnetoreception, Max Planck Institute for Neurobiology of Behavior - caesar, 53175 Bonn, Germany.
Gerald FalkenbergDeutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, 22607 Hamburg, Germany.
Dennis BrücknerDeutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, 22607 Hamburg, Germany.
Clemens DiwokyInstitute of Molecular Biosciences, University of Graz, Graz 8010, Austria.
Kristian BrediesDepartment of Mathematics and Scientific Computing, University of Graz, Graz 8010, Austria.
Malte BrammerlohDepartment of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Daryl HowardAustralian Synchrotron, ANSTO, Clayton, 3168 VIC, Australia.
David J PatersonAustralian Synchrotron, ANSTO, Clayton, 3168 VIC, Australia.
Kadda MedjoubiSynchrotron SOLEIL, 91190 Saint-Aubin, France.
Stephan IrsenCore Facility Electron Microscopy and Analytics, Max Planck Institute for Neurobiology of Behavior - caesar, 53175 Bonn, Germany.
Sybille Wolf-KümmethResearch Group Neurobiology of Magnetoreception, Max Planck Institute for Neurobiology of Behavior - caesar, 53175 Bonn, Germany.
Li ZhangResearch Group Neurobiology of Magnetoreception, Max Planck Institute for Neurobiology of Behavior - caesar, 53175 Bonn, Germany.
Martha M M DanielResearch Group Neurobiology of Magnetoreception, Max Planck Institute for Neurobiology of Behavior - caesar, 53175 Bonn, Germany.
David A SimpsonSchool of Physics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3010 VIC, Australia.
Sabine BegallDepartment of General Zoology, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45141 Essen, Germany.
E Pascal MalkemperResearch Group Neurobiology of Magnetoreception, Max Planck Institute for Neurobiology of Behavior - caesar, 53175 Bonn, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetoreception is widespread across animals, but its sensory mechanism remains unresolved. One leading hypothesis proposes that single-domain magnetite is coupled to mechanosensitive ion channels. In subterranean Ansell's mole-rats, such receptors have been proposed to reside in the cornea or retina. We screened for magnetite in the mole-rat eye by combining iron imaging via enhanced Prussian blue staining and synchrotron X-ray fluorescence microscopy (XFM) with magnetic imaging via MRI-quantitative susceptibility mapping (MRI-QSM) and quantum-diamond microscopy. The retina and cornea contained little iron, most of which co-localized with titanium or chromium, indicating a non-biogenic origin. Iron-enriched lines in the cornea did not show ferrimagnetic signals. MRI-QSM revealed the highest susceptibility in the ciliary body, where iron-rich pigmented cells were identified. A targeted TEM-screen, however, failed to detect single-domain magnetite particles. In conclusion, we found no evidence of magnetite-based magnetoreceptors in the cornea or retina, suggesting other tissues or mechanisms underlie mole-rat magnetoreception.

Indexed as

animal navigationbiometalscorneamagnetoreceptionmagnetosensationmicroscopyretina

Identifiers

PMID42827897
PMCPMC13632215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.