Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42827890›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Social influence and academic performance: a serial mediation model in AI-enhanced learning.

Anish Kumar Bhunia, Saeed Alzahrani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anish Kumar BhuniaDepartment of Management & Humanities, National Institute of Technology, Arunachal Pradesh, Jote, Arunachal Pradesh, India.
Saeed AlzahraniDepartment of Management Information Systems, College of Business Administration, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study examines how social influence affects the academic performance of Saudi university students, focusing on the mediating roles of AI self-efficacy, smart learning, academic stress, and mental wellbeing. The study is grounded in Social Learning Theory. Methods: A quantitative research design was employed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Data were collected from 345 university students enrolled at three public universities in Saudi Arabia. A theoretical model based on Social Learning Theory was developed to examine the relationships among social influence, AI self-efficacy, smart learning, academic stress, mental wellbeing, and academic performance. Results: The findings supported all 10 proposed hypotheses. Social influence had a significant direct effect on academic performance ( Discussion: The findings show that social influence affects academic performance through multiple psychological and learning-related pathways. AI self-efficacy emerged as the strongest predictor, highlighting the importance of students' confidence in using AI for learning. Overall, the study extends Social Learning Theory to AI-supported higher education and emphasizes the importance of AI self-efficacy, smart learning, and psychological wellbeing in promoting academic success among Saudi university students.

Indexed as

academic performanceacademic stressAI self-efficacyhigher educationmental wellbeingSaudi Arabiaserial mediationsmart learning

Identifiers

PMID42827890
PMCPMC13630773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.