ArticleThe mental health clinician2026
The role of depression in adherence to colorectal cancer screening guidelines.
Article in The mental health clinician, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the United States with an incidence rate of approximately 442.3 out of 100 000. In 2021, colorectal cancer (CRC) was responsible for more than 52 000 deaths. Screening is a preventive practice that can detect CRC early. More than 70% of adults aged 45 years or older get screened at least once, yet far fewer follow recommended screening guidelines. Depression is associated with an increased risk of CRC and CRC-related mortality and a reduction in regular CRC screening, making it a significant psychosocial barrier to preventive screening. This cross-sectional study examined factors associated with adherence to CRC screening recommendations, particularly among individuals with a self-reported depression diagnosis. Methods: Utilizing a representative national sample (n = 204 539) from the 2023 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (adults aged≥50), we assessed the effects of depression and key variables associated with depression and CRC screening on the likelihood of adherence. Our model included interactions between depression and race/ethnicity, education, and income among other variables. Results: African Americans (AA) with depression were 60% less likely to meet recommendations than AA without depression (odds ratio = 0.40, 99% confidence interval = 0.29, 0.55). Discussion: The results suggest a critical need for health care practitioners to assess patient mental health, especially among AA patients, who are at higher risk of developing CRC despite an overall higher likelihood of being screened. Targeting the highest risk individuals, particularly those with depression, may reduce costs for public health campaigns targeting CRC screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.