ReviewFrontiers in chemistry2026
Novel bioactive compounds in the treatment of osteoporosis: chemistry-driven discovery from preclinical validation to clinical translation.
Review in Frontiers in chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteoporosis affects an estimated 200 million people worldwide. Fragility fractures of the hip, spine, and wrist carry high mortality and impose a heavy socioeconomic burden. Bisphosphonates, denosumab, selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), teriparatide, abaloparatide, and the recent sclerostin antibody romosozumab have improved clinical outcomes, but unmet needs remain. Long-term antiresorptive use is complicated by atypical femoral fractures and osteonecrosis of the jaw; denosumab discontinuation causes rebound bone loss; romosozumab carries a cardiovascular caution. Persistence on therapy beyond 1 year is low, and no oral osteoanabolic agent has reached the clinic. Against this background, medicinal chemistry is producing a wave of next-line compounds. These include rationally designed small molecules and peptidomimetics targeting the Wnt pathway, calcium-sensing receptor antagonists (calcilytics) intended to mimic pulsatile parathyroid hormone, refined cathepsin K inhibitors, modulators of activin and myostatin signaling, and bone-targeted nanomedicines. Plant-derived scaffolds with anti-osteoporotic activity, particularly icariin, icaritin, genistein, naringin, resveratrol, curcumin, oleanolic acid, psoralen, and berberine, are being optimized chemically to address poor bioavailability. Senolytic combinations and PROTAC-based degraders represent newer modes of action. This review examines the chemistry behind these compounds, their structure-activity relationships, their preclinical pharmacology, and their progress through clinical evaluation. We pay particular attention to the failures (odanacatib, calcilytics, integrin antagonists, Src inhibitors) as well as the successes, because the lessons from attrition shape the chemistry choices that follow. We attempt to identify those chemistry-led strategies that have most reliably accelerated bench-to-bedside translation in bone disease, and those that have not.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.