Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42827828›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medical technology2026

Approval lag and loss for biologic-device combination products in Japan and the United States.

Makiko Mochizuki, Hideki Maeda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medical technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Makiko MochizukiDepartment of Regulatory Science, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Meiji Pharmaceutical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Hideki MaedaDepartment of Regulatory Science, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Meiji Pharmaceutical University, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The market for drug delivery devices (DDDs), including combination products that integrate pharmaceuticals and medical devices, has expanded rapidly with the increasing use of biopharmaceuticals and growing adoption of self-administration. However, the extent and causes of approval lag and approval loss for device presentations, defined as presentations approved in one country but unavailable in the other, have not been systematically evaluated between Japan and the United States. Methods: We analyzed approvals of biopharmaceuticals in various device presentations, including prefilled syringes (PFS), autoinjectors, multidose pen injectors, on-body injectors (OBIs), and cartridge formulations, using the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) and U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) databases from 2000 to 2025. Results: Among 176 biopharmaceutical products approved in the United States, 16% were not approved in Japan. However, most cases were attributable to approval loss by drug, reflecting products whose active substances were not approved for the Japanese market, rather than approval loss by device presentation. Although median approval lag tended to vary across device presentations, with multidose pen injectors and cartridge presentations showing median delays exceeding approximately two years and autoinjectors showing the shortest lag at approximately 10 months, these differences were not statistically significant. Statistical analyses using Pearson's chi-square, Fisher's exact, and Kruskal-Wallis tests showed no significant differences in device presentation approval between Japan and the United States after excluding products lacking active substance approval in either country ( Discussion: In the United States, multiple device presentations were often approved simultaneously, whereas Japan more frequently adopted a stepwise approval approach. Differences in the regulatory scope of combination products and co-packaging requirements also contributed to country- specific packaging, potentially prolonging pre-approval preparation and increasing supply chain complexity. Overall, regulatory approval discrepancies between Japan and the United States were driven primarily by drug loss rather than device presentation loss. Accelerating drug approval, promoting simultaneous development of multiple device presentations, and enhancing regulatory harmonization for combination products may reduce approval lag by device presentation and improve patient access.

Indexed as

autoinjectorscombination productsdrug delivery devicesdrug-device combination productsJapanmedical devicesprefilled syringes

Identifiers

PMID42827828
PMCPMC13630725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.