ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026
Follower arm muscle activity during the driver swing and its association with stroking performance in male golfers of different skill levels.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to investigate the activation patterns of the follower-arm muscles during the driver swing in male golfers of different skill levels and to examine their associations with stroking performance parameters, with the goal of elucidating the functional role of the follower arm in the golf swing. Methods: Sixteen right-handed golfers (8 National Level 1 and 8 National Level 2 athletes) participated, and multiple valid swing trials were collected from each participant with each individual swing treated as a measurement unit. Surface electromyography (sEMG) signals were collected from the follower-side triceps brachii, biceps brachii, pronator teres, flexor carpi ulnaris, and extensor carpi radialis brevis. The swing cycle was divided into five phases (P1-P5). Inter-group comparisons of normalized EMG were performed using Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM). The root mean square (RMS) amplitude of each muscle per phase was compared between groups using t-tests. Spearman correlation analysis was employed to explore the relationships between muscle RMS and stroking performance. Results: No significant inter-group differences were found in stroking performance parameters or swing phase durations (p > 0.05). SPM analysis revealed that Level 1 athletes exhibited lower triceps brachii activation during the 80%-87% swing cycle (p = 0.022), higher pronator teres activation during 70%-72% (p = 0.032), higher flexor carpi ulnaris activation during 78%-86% (p = 0.017), and lower extensor carpi radialis brevis activation during 56%-64% (p = 0.019) compared to Level 2 athletes. The RMS comparisons at the uncorrected α = 0.05 level showed that Level 1 athletes had lower biceps brachii activation in P2 (p = 0.028), higher flexor carpi ulnaris activation in P4 (p = 0.011), and lower triceps brachii activation in P4 (p = 0.044) than Level 2 athletes. Exploratory correlation analyses revealed nominal associations (uncorrected p < 0.05) between flexor carpi ulnaris activation during P2 and carry distance (ρ = 0.528), biceps brachii activation during P2, P3 and backspin (ρ = 0.574, 0.575), and pronator teres activation during P3 and angle of attack (ρ = 0.592). Conclusion: The activation of the flexor carpi ulnaris, pronator teres, and other follower arm muscles exhibited temporal specificity and showed nominal associations with stroking outcomes. Skill-level differences were observed in both the SPM and RMS of muscle activation, with the most pronounced distinctions occurring in phase specific patterns during the downswing and follow through. The mechanical mechanisms underlying these activation patterns and their functional relevance to the stroking performance remain uncertain, warranting further investigation with synchronized kinematic and kinetic measurements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.