ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Exposure to restrictive diet content on social media and dietary behaviors among women aged 18-49 years in Poland.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Social media have become one of the primary sources of nutrition-related information among young adults; however, the widespread promotion of restrictive diets may contribute to unhealthy eating behaviors and body image concerns. The aim of this study was to examine the association between exposure to restrictive diet-related content on social media and eating-behavior dimensions measured using the TFEQ-13 among women aged 18-49 years in Poland. Additionally, the study descriptively assessed participants' restrictive dietary practices and their self-reported perceptions regarding the influence of social media on dietary decisions, self-esteem, and body image. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 370 women using an original questionnaire and the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ-13). The questionnaire assessed exposure to diet-related content, restrictive dietary practices, sources of nutrition information, body image, and eating-related behaviors. Results: Most respondents reported exposure to diet-related social media content several times daily (70.8%), with Instagram and TikTok representing the primary information sources. Nearly half of the participants had followed a diet promoted on social media, most commonly involving sugar elimination or intermittent fasting. Rapid weight loss was the leading motivation for adopting restrictive diets. Although physicians and dietitians were perceived as the most trusted sources of nutrition information, participants frequently reported perceiving social media content as relevant to their dietary decisions, body image, and eating-related attitudes. Self-reported body dissatisfaction, guilt after eating foods perceived as unhealthy, and restrictive or compensatory eating practices were common in the sample. In inferential analyses, greater exposure to restrictive diet-related social media content was positively associated with cognitive restraint and uncontrolled eating after adjustment for age, educational level, place of residence, and previous experience with restrictive diets promoted on social media, whereas the adjusted association with emotional eating was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Frequent exposure to restrictive diet-related social media content was associated with higher cognitive restraint and, to a lesser extent, uncontrolled eating. Body dissatisfaction, restrictive dietary practices, and potentially maladaptive eating-related attitudes were also frequently reported but were assessed descriptively and should not be interpreted as outcomes statistically associated with social media exposure. Given the cross-sectional design, the observed associations do not establish causality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.