ReviewFrontiers in computational neuroscience2026
Design principles for cost functions in optimal sensory coding.
Review in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Studies of neural codes for sensory variables are rooted in the long-established principle that neural codes are organized to encode as much information as possible about sensory stimuli. This principle has been successful in explaining many features of neural activity, suggesting that a key component of a cost function determining sensory neural coding from first principles is the stimulus encoding error. However, recent work has shown that neural cost functions may have other terms reflecting costs or limitations of the biological hardware. One key piece is the metabolic cost of neural activity. Including metabolic cost in the cost function leads to optimized spiking models that exhibit spike-triggered adaptation. Another possible component of the neural cost function is reliable downstream transmission of information. Neurons have short integration time constants, which make it difficult for information to be transmitted reliably unless inputs to neurons are correlated. This suggests that cost functions accounting for constraints on downstream readout promote codes with redundancy-inducing correlations. We review and discuss evidence that neural codes in the brain have features consistent with the predictions expected if cost functions have additional terms beyond the encoding error. Adaptation currents are indeed present in biological neurons with the time scales predicted by metabolically efficient codes, and neural population codes have information-reducing correlations that support downstream information transmission. Finally, we discuss future directions important for fully establishing the different contributions to neural cost functions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.