ArticleThe World Allergy Organization journal2026
Long-term prophylactic treatment and related real-world outcomes of patients with hereditary angioedema in Germany: A retrospective analysis of German claims and medical chart data.
Article in The World Allergy Organization journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare genetic disorder characterized by recurrent swelling episodes that are potentially life threating and substantially impair quality of life. This study aimed to generate real-world evidence on the utilization of long-term prophylaxis (LTP), residual disease burden, and economic outcomes among patients with HAE in Germany. Methods: This retrospective cohort study examined LTP patterns and associated real-world outcomes using 2 anonymized German statutory health insurance datasets (AOK PLUS and GWQ) and a medical chart review (MCR) from 1 specialized HAE center. Claims datasets included patients initiating LTP between 2019 and 2023. The MCR provided complementary clinical information and was used to assess the plausibility of prescription-based estimates for attack frequency. Outcomes included LTP treatment sequences, HAE attacks requiring on-demand treatment (ODT), healthcare resource utilization and direct cost. Results: Across the claims datasets, 77 patients initiated first-line LTP: 30 (39.0%) with intravenous C1 esterase inhibitors (C1INH IV), 24 (31.2%) with lanadelumab, 16 (20.8%) with subcutaneous C1INH, and 7 (9.1%) with berotralstat. During follow-up, 27 patients (35.1%) switched therapy, most commonly from C1INH IV to lanadelumab. Despite prophylaxis, 64% of patients experienced at least 1 HAE attack requiring ODT, while 36% remained attack-free during the first year after LTP start. Median time to first treated attack ranged from 114 to 132 days. Prescription-based attack estimates were generally consistent with physician-documented attack frequencies but tended to yield slightly higher attack rates. Annual healthcare costs were driven primarily by outpatient medications, averaging €233,190 and €206,392 per person-year in the AOK PLUS and GWQ cohorts, respectively. Conclusion: This study provides real-world evidence on LTP use in Germany and demonstrates that a substantial proportion of patients continues to experience treated attacks despite prophylaxis. These findings highlight the importance of ongoing monitoring, individualized treatment optimization, and continued access to ODT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.