ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
A machine learning model for predicting six-month rehospitalization in heart failure patients with multiple comorbidities.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This research (retrospective cohort study) investigates how tailored discharge instructions for heart failure (HF) patients with multiple health conditions can lower their emergency or urgent care readmission risk. Utilizing an AI/ML approach, this study develops a model that classifies HF patients' readmission risk at discharge by evaluating approximately 20 parameters across five categories, including comorbidities (e.g., liver disease, diabetes), patient demographics (e.g., age, BMI), clinical data (e.g., lipid and blood levels), diagnostic parameters (e.g., ejection fraction, HF type), discharge details (e.g., discharge destination and location), and medication history. The AI model identifies high-risk patients, who are then prescribed a more focused wellness and rehabilitation plan, including in-person visits and regular monitoring. Lower-risk patients are given less rigorous plans, involving virtual check-ins and self-management tools. In contrast, high-risk patients can undergo intensive wellness plans, involving hospital/clinical visits and tracking by wellness staff. The study's approach of customizing post-discharge care based on re-admission risk aims to reduce re-admissions and improve HF patient outcomes. This research employs key ML models on the PhysioNet dataset, a collection of hospital admissions and mortality records for HF patients from Zigong Fourth People's Hospital in Sichuan, China (2016-2019). To evaluate the broader applicability of the developed models, their results on the PhysioNet dataset are benchmarked against the HCUP Maryland SID (2014), a secondary dataset of HF patients. The ML models exhibited strong performance, achieving efficiencies exceeding 76% and specificities reaching 97% in identifying HF patients with a higher risk of readmission and ranking them according to their risk level. The study's approach to customizing post-discharge care based on readmission risk aims to reduce readmissions and improve HF patient outcomes. Thus, this presents a comprehensive and reliable strategy for HF management and wellness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.