ArticleFrontiers in neurology2026
Differential effects of static and dynamic visual prompts on attention-motor performance: the role of sustained attention after stroke.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Visual prompts enhance motor performance in goal-directed tasks by modulating attentional resource allocation. Given that stroke patients often exhibit attentional deficits and impaired visual processing, cue-based interventions are increasingly used in neurorehabilitation. However, how different prompt types interact with attentional capacity to influence attention-motor performance remains unclear. This study aimed to examine the differential effects of static and dynamic prompts in stroke patients and healthy controls. Methods: Sustained attention was assessed using the Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART) in stroke patients and healthy controls. A virtual reality-based Target-Goal Task (TGT) was employed to compare the effects of static and dynamic prompts between groups. Results: Stroke patients showed significant impairments in attention-motor performance compared with controls. In healthy individuals, dynamic prompts were associated with faster response times, higher prefrontal oxygenated hemoglobin levels, and more efficient brain network topology (i.e., higher clustering coefficient [CC] and shorter characteristic path length [PL]), indicating enhanced attentional allocation and information integration. In contrast, stroke patients performed better under static cue conditions, possibly due to lower cognitive load demands. Discussion: The effects of visual prompts depend on sustained attention capacity. These findings highlight the importance of tailoring prompt strategies to individual cognitive profiles and provide evidence for personalized visual cue-based rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.