ArticleRadiology case reports2026
Focal periphyseal edema with atypical MRI features: Biopsy findings and imaging follow-up.
Article in Radiology case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Focal periphyseal edema (FOPE) is a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) finding centered on the closing physis of the adolescent knee and generally regarded as a benign, self-limiting manifestation of physiologic physeal fusion. To date, no report has described biopsy findings in FOPE, as the diagnosis has relied exclusively on imaging characteristics and clinical follow-up. An 11-year-old male competitive swimmer presented with a 2-month history of atraumatic right anterior knee pain. Radiographs were unremarkable. Laboratory studies showed no evidence of inflammation. MRI demonstrated T2-hyperintense signal on both sides of the distal femoral epiphyseal plate, with extension to the adjacent medial metaphyseal cortex and gadolinium enhancement suggestive of physeal destruction. Given the imaging appearance and a differential diagnosis of osteosarcoma, chondroblastoma, giant cell tumor, and osteomyelitis, an image-guided core needle biopsy was performed to exclude aggressive pathology. Histopathology demonstrated normal tissue without inflammatory or neoplastic cells, and cultures were sterile. These findings excluded malignancy and infection in the sampled tissue, and a presumptive diagnosis of FOPE was made, and the patient was managed expectantly. At 3-month follow-up, the patient was asymptomatic, and repeat MRI showed marked interval improvement of the previously noted findings, although faint residual signal persisted. In this case, biopsy served to exclude aggressive disease rather than to confirm a specific histologic pattern of FOPE, and the diagnosis was ultimately supported by the subsequent clinical resolution and imaging improvement. These findings support a conservative, noninvasive diagnostic and management approach when imaging findings are otherwise typical of this entity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.