Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42827634›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2026

Utilization of stakeholder engagement to inform the identification of leading indicators for clinical research enrollment performance in a large integrated health care system: The VA clinical research enrollment summit.

Marcus R Johnson, Aliya Asghar Uddin, Michael Wininger, Jennifer Romesser, Kandi Velarde, Jeff Newcomb, Margaret Tiktin, Susan Alton Dailey, Cindy Liu, Grant D Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Marcus R JohnsonDurham VA Health Care System, USA.
Aliya Asghar UddinVA Long Beach Healthcare System, USA.
Michael WiningerVA Connecticut Healthcare System, USA.
Jennifer RomesserVA Salt Lake City Healthcare System, USA.
Kandi VelardeVA Salt Lake City Healthcare System, USA.
Jeff NewcombVA Nebraska - Western Iowa Health Care System, USA.
Margaret TiktinVA Northeast Ohio Healthcare System, USA.
Susan Alton DaileyDurham VA Health Care System, USA.
Cindy LiuVA Puget Sound Health Care System, USA.
Grant D HuangVA Office of Research & Development, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Study participant enrollment remains the ubiquitous rate-limiter in the successful completion of clinical trials. Enrollment efficiency is a principal determinant of study performance and outcomes; and the nature of the enrolled cohort has major implications for study generalizability. Thus, all stakeholders have a role, and responsibility, in attaining enrollment targets, and each process partner has a unique vantage-point in measuring and troubleshooting enrollment barriers. The Cooperative Studies Program (CSP) is the intramural research program for multi-site clinical trials and epidemiological studies within the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). The CSP's designated research site support infrastructure is the Network of Dedicated Enrollment Sites (NODES), which convenes annual plenary meetings to benchmark institutional performances, evaluate and update programmatic best practices, and strategize innovative approaches in clinical trial execution. The VA Clinical Research Enrollment Summit Workgroup (CREW) identifies and brings together individuals that have a vested interest in the performance of CSP and VA sponsored research (stakeholders) and this group includes representation from across CSP, invited keynote speakers, and panelists from across the VA community, yielding an evolving portrait of how clinical trialists should endeavor to motivate, manage and measure study enrollment. This manuscript focuses on the successes, challenges, and lessons learned from the VA Clinical Research Enrollment Summit Workgroup (CREW) during the development and implementation of this forum, as well as outcomes from these summits to date.

Indexed as

Clinical trial enrollmentCSPDepartment of veterans affairsNODESStakeholder engagement

Identifiers

PMID42827634
PMCPMC13631528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.