ReviewInternational journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention2026
Systematic review of clinical guidance for lipid management in adults with or at risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: A global perspective.
Review in International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: To identify clinical guidance globally on lipid management in adults who are at risk of or diagnosed with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and to summarize recommendations for patients with increasingly prevalent diseases (i.e., diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and obesity), older adults, and women. Methods: A systematic review of clinical guidance published within the last 10 years was performed by searching Embase, MEDLINE, and guideline-specific databases. Relevant guidance documents were selected by two independent reviewers. Recommendations pertaining to lipid testing, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals, lifestyle modifications, and lipid-lowering treatment were extracted. Results: A total of 109 clinical practice guidelines and expert consensus statements were identified, which were international (10%) or developed within Europe or the United Kingdom (31%), Asia-Pacific (26%), the United States or Canada (23%), Latin America (5%), the Middle East (5%), or Africa (<1%). Although clinical guidance provides common recommendations for lipid management in patients at risk of or diagnosed with ASCVD, including patients with diabetes or chronic kidney disease, recommendations concerning LDL-C goals and use of non-statin therapies often differ across guidance documents. Furthermore, recommendations specific to older adults, women, and patients with obesity are sparse. Conclusions: Although clinical guidance from around the world provides a common framework for lipid management, important differences remain in recommendations concerning LDL-C goals, use of non-statin therapies, and management of certain patient populations. Future research and guidance development may help address these gaps and improve the consistency and applicability of recommendations across healthcare settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.