ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
A prediction model based on the prognostic nutritional index for grade 2 or higher radiation-induced oral mucositis in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: To develop a prediction model based on the prognostic nutritional index for grade 2 or higher radiation-induced oral mucositis in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma, providing a basis for early identification of patients at high risk. Methods: We retrospectively included 192 patients with primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma who received chemoradiotherapy at the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University between May 2020 and December 2025. Patients were randomly assigned in a 7:3 ratio to a training set (n = 133) and an internal validation set (n = 59). Baseline characteristics were compared after tests of normality and homogeneity of variance. Candidate variables were selected jointly using LASSO, random forest, and support vector machine recursive feature elimination, followed by univariable and multivariable logistic regression to identify factors associated with grade 2 or higher radiation-induced oral mucositis. A nomogram was constructed, and Firth penalized likelihood regression was used to reduce small-sample bias. Model performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic analysis and calibration curves, while clinical utility was evaluated by decision curve analysis. Propensity score matching was then used for sensitivity analysis. Results: The prognostic nutritional index was an independent protective factor of grade 2 or higher radiation-induced oral mucositis. The area under the curve was 0.842 in the training set and 0.725 in the validation set. Patients in the group with high prognostic nutritional index values had a markedly lower risk (OR = 0.067, P < 0.001), and the finding remained consistent in the Firth regression analysis. The association also remained significant after 1:1 propensity score matching (OR = 0.709, P < 0.001; AUC = 0.810). Conclusion: The prognostic nutritional index is an independent predictor of grade 2 or higher radiation-induced oral mucositis, and the model showed useful predictive performance for this outcome in patients with NPC receiving chemoradiotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.