ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Association between peripheral retinal lesions and ocular biometric parameters in adults with mild-to-moderate myopia attending a refractive surgery clinic.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To investigate the association between peripheral retinal lesions (PRLs) and ocular biometric parameters in adults with mild-to-moderate myopia. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study included 106 adults who contributed 171 eligible eyes with mild-to-moderate myopia. Based on dilated fundus examination and ultra-widefield imaging, 70 eyes were assigned to the PRL group and 101 eyes to the normal-fundus (NF) group. Participant age and eye-level spherical equivalent (SE), axial length (AL), mean corneal power (Km), corneal curvature radius (CR), and the exploratory corneal-curvature-adjusted parameter SEAL were compared. Eye-level continuous comparisons used participant-clustered robust standard errors. Lesion types and quadrant distributions were recorded descriptively. Results: Mean age did not differ between the groups (21.17 ± 3.76 vs. 22.04 ± 3.13 years, Conclusion: In this refractive-surgery-clinic sample, PRLs were associated at the eye level with longer AL, flatter corneas, and more negative exploratory SEAL values. Because the study was cross-sectional and did not include multivariable modeling, these findings do not establish independent predictors or causal relationships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.