ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026
Machine learning-based prediction of postoperative venous thromboembolism in orthopedic surgery using the MIMIC-IV database and external validation.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: A risk prediction model for venous thromboembolism (VTE) after orthopedic surgery was constructed and validated using machine learning algorithms, providing a reference for the early identification of high-risk individuals in clinical settings. Method: Patients who underwent orthopedic surgery were retrospectively collected from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC-IV) database as the modeling group. The patients were randomly divided into training and internal test sets in a 7:3 ratio. A total of 156 patients who underwent orthopedic surgery in our hospital from January 2022 to July 2025 were selected for the external validation set. Predictive variables were selected using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. Six machine learning models were constructed: logistic regression (LR), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting (XGB), light gradient boosting machine (LGBM), and naive Bayes (NBM). The model performance was evaluated by using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, and G-mean. The interpretability of the optimal model was analyzed using the calibration curves, decision curve analysis (DCA), and SHAP methods. Results: The MIMIC-IV database included 461 patients (VTE incidence rate, 15.8%). LASSO regression identified two predictive variables: fibrinogen and D-dimer levels. The AUC of the LGBM model in the internal test set was 0.893 (95% CI: 0.820-0.966), and in the external validation, the AUC of the LGBM model was 0.788. The predictive performance of this model was superior to that of the other five models tested. The calibration curve indicated that the model was well calibrated, and the decision curve suggested a clinical net benefit within the 0.1-0.6 threshold range. SHAP analysis showed that elevated fibrinogen and D-dimer levels were positively correlated with the risk of VTE. Conclusion: The LGBM model constructed based on the MIMIC-IV database has excellent predictive efficacy for VTE after orthopedic surgery and certain external generalization abilities. Fibrinogen and D-dimer levels are key predictive factors. This model can serve as a preliminary reference tool for risk stratification of VTE after orthopedic surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.