ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
Early recognition and risk stratification of cardiac rupture after acute myocardial infarction: from clinical red flags to emerging biomarkers.
Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiac rupture (CR) remains among the most lethal mechanical complications of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), with in-hospital mortality exceeding 50%. Although primary percutaneous coronary intervention has reduced CR incidence to 1%-2%, mortality has not declined proportionally because the abrupt onset of rupture limits the opportunity for intervention. The early post-infarction period-particularly the first 72 h for free wall rupture and extending through day 7 for ventricular septal and papillary muscle rupture-represents the critical window for detection. This mini review synthesizes clinical warning signs, point-of-care imaging findings, and circulating biomarker trajectories that may herald impending CR, organized by temporal window and rupture subtype. We evaluate emerging biomarkers reflecting inflammatory, extracellular-matrix-degradation, and myocardial-stress pathways, as well as artificial intelligence-assisted prediction tools. Building upon the prediction model synthesis by Mao et al. within this Research Topic, we propose a four-step risk stratification algorithm integrating baseline clinical predictors, dynamic three-track surveillance (clinical, imaging, and biomarker), red-flag-triggered risk re-classification, and subtype-specific diagnostic pathways. This framework is designed to bridge the translational gap between statistical risk estimation and actionable bedside recognition during the critical post-AMI period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.