ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Evaluation of primary school teachers' use and perceptions of artificial intelligence in primary school mathematics instruction: a mixed-methods study.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study examined primary school teachers' reported perceptions and self-reported uses of artificial intelligence (AI) in primary school mathematics instruction, with particular attention to how perceptions vary according to teachers' demographic characteristics and AI-related experiences. Methods: The study employed an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design and was conducted with 302 primary school teachers in Türkiye during the 2024-2025 academic year. Quantitative data were collected using the Scale for Assessing Teachers' Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence in Education. The quantitative findings were subsequently elaborated through semi-structured interviews with teachers who had prior AI-related training. Results: Teachers reported moderately positive overall perceptions of AI in mathematics instruction. Perception scores varied according to gender, professional experience, educational background, frequency of AI use, and prior AI training, although these differences were not consistent across all dimensions and some were practically modest. More frequent AI use and prior AI-related training were associated with more positive perceptions. Qualitative findings showed that teachers primarily positioned AI as a supportive resource for lesson planning, content and material development, visualization, problem solving, formative assessment, feedback, and out-of-class learning. ChatGPT, GeoGebra, and Photomath were among the most frequently mentioned tools. Teachers also identified concerns regarding age appropriateness, technological infrastructure, data privacy, reliability, teacher competence, and students' possible over-reliance on ready-made responses. Discussion: The findings indicate a generally favorable but cautious orientation toward AI in primary mathematics education. Teachers' willingness to use AI and positive attitudes do not necessarily reflect extensive or pedagogically established classroom integration. Rather than demonstrating instructional effectiveness, the study provides a context-specific account of the perceived pedagogical opportunities, practical constraints, and conditions associated with responsible AI integration in primary mathematics instruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.