Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42827570›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026

Strategies to enhance engagement in CBT for adult ADHD: an innovation tournament with stakeholders.

Margaret H Sibley, Melisa Shafiee, Laura E Knouse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Margaret H SibleyDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, United States.
Melisa ShafieeDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Laura E KnouseDepartment of Psychology, University of Richmond, Richmond, VA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Adults with ADHD report challenges engaging in cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT). This study investigates practices that might be applied to improve intervention fit and therapeutic engagement of CBT for adults with ADHD. Method: We conducted an Innovation Tournament (IT) and member checking with participants ( Results: A range of engagement barriers were identified, chief among them practitioner low understanding of ADHD (44.4%) and lack of attention to relevant impairments (33.3%). The highest rated focal areas for CBT were task management, organization, planning, and prioritization, emotion regulation strategies, responding to negative/maladaptive thoughts, anti-procrastination and self-motivation strategies, and long-term goal setting. Top recommendations for engagement strategies include ensuring high therapist knowledge of ADHD and 17 elements consistent with Motivational Interviewing. Some practices commonly found in CBTs for ADHD were rated as unpopular with stakeholders, most notably providing weekly ratings of ADHD symptoms as progress monitoring. Some practices rated as important to adults with ADHD were rated as not feasible to practitioners-most notably reducing shame and nurturing confidence. Implementation barriers identified were primarily related to low practitioner knowledge and skills, but also sometimes systemic constraints on practice. Conclusions: Implementation of recommended practices noted in this study should be tested empirically to understand the extent to which they increase engagement and effectiveness over standard practice.

Indexed as

ADHDcognitive behavioral therapyintervention designstakeholder co-designtreatment engagement

Identifiers

PMID42827570
PMCPMC13631060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.