ArticleNPJ clean water2026
Toward trustworthy water quality monitoring under sensor unreliability.
Article in NPJ clean water, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Water Distribution Networks (WDNs) are vital for public health and economic activity, and early contamination detection and source-region prioritization are essential for timely response. Although Internet-of-things sensors and machine learning enable online monitoring, water quality sensors are costly and prone to faults, which can distort measurements and lead to false alarms or missed contamination events. Existing contamination localization methods typically assume reliable, fault-free measurements, an assumption often violated in real-world deployments. Here, we propose a unified data-driven framework that explicitly accounts for sensor unreliability while supporting contamination source-region prioritization. In this study, we focus on the monitoring of chlorine-reactive pollutants such as arsenite as a primary application scenario to evaluate the framework's performance. The framework jointly integrates sensor fault detection, localization, isolation, faulty signal reconstruction, and contamination source-region prioritization within a single monitoring pipeline. A convolutional autoencoder detects and reconstructs corrupted measurements to recover the underlying clean signal, while a CNN-LSTM model performs fault isolation and supports downstream contamination analysis. An explicit fault-contamination differentiation mechanism is further introduced to distinguish sensor-induced deviations from genuine contamination signatures. Comprehensive evaluations are conducted on three realistic WDNs under tested network layouts, synthetic chlorine-reactive contamination scenarios, and evaluated fault models. The results demonstrate that while pinpointing the exact single node is challenging under sparse sensor coverage, the framework can narrow down likely candidate source regions, achieving up to approximately 80% Top-10 source-region prioritization accuracy. These findings highlight that jointly modeling sensor faults and contamination processes is useful for fault-aware contamination source-region prioritization under degraded sensing conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.