ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2026
School refusal behavior in children and adolescents: a concept analysis.
Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
School refusal behavior (SRB) is increasingly recognized across educational, pediatric, and mental health settings, yet its conceptual boundaries remain unclear, and the term is frequently conflated with school refusal, truancy, school withdrawal, school exclusion, and broader school attendance problems. This study used Walker and Avant's concept analysis method to clarify the meaning, defining attributes, antecedents, consequences, and empirical referents of SRB. PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and PsycINFO were searched for English-language literature published through January 2026, supplemented by Google Scholar and manual citation searching. A total of 100 sources were included and analyzed through iterative comparison of conceptual definitions, recurrent characteristics, contextual conditions, outcomes, and indicators used in research and practice. The analysis showed that SRB has evolved from earlier anxiety-centered descriptions toward a broader behavioral and functional construct. Four defining attributes were identified: difficulty initiating, sustaining, or completing school attendance or participation; young person-expressed attendance difficulty; aversive school-related experiences or emotional distress; and heterogeneous avoidance- or reinforcement-related maintaining functions. Antecedents were distributed across individual, family, peer and interpersonal, and school-contextual domains, while consequences extended across academic, psychological, social, family, and service-related domains and may accumulate over time. Empirical identification requires the integration of observable attendance patterns, emotional, behavioral, and somatic responses, functional assessment, and contextual information from young people, caregivers, and school personnel. Moving beyond the summary of existing definitions, this analysis proposes an integrative framework that distinguishes the observable form of attendance difficulty from its emotional presentation, maintaining functions, and ecological context. SRB is therefore best understood as a persistent or recurrent, young person-expressed pattern of disrupted school attendance or participation that is clinically meaningful but cannot be reduced to a single diagnosis, cause, or attendance threshold. By clarifying what constitutes SRB and how it differs from other forms of school attendance problems, this framework may support earlier recognition of emerging attendance difficulties, more comprehensive assessment of underlying needs, and better coordination among mental health professionals, families, and schools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.