Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42827520›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Machine learning prediction models for the popularization and dissemination of medical science popularization videos.

Nuo Cheng, Xiu-Ling Wang, Xiao-Xue Zeng, Hui-Jun Li, Chenxuan Xu, Yan-Ning Ma, Da-Xin Gong, Yonghui Yuan, Shuang Zang, Guang-Wei Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nuo Cheng *Department of Gynecology, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Xiu-Ling Wang *Department of Cardiology, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Xiao-Xue Zeng *Department of General Practice, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Hui-Jun LiSmart Hospital Management Department, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Chenxuan XuGoizueta School of Business, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Yan-Ning MaDepartment of Cardiology, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Da-Xin GongSmart Hospital Management Department, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Yonghui YuanCancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Clinical Research Center for Malignant Tumor of Liaoning Province, Shenyang, China.
Shuang ZangDepartment of Community Nursing, School of Nursing, China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Guang-Wei ZhangDepartment of General Practice, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To summarize the current production and release trends of medical science popularization videos, analyze the effect of non-medical factors on their spread, and develop dissemination-prediction models using machine learning (ML) algorithms. Methods: We identified a sample of medical science popularization videos on TikTok ( Results: In the quantitative analysis of the 4 outcomes, we identified significant disparities among different videos, "Thumb-Up" with a range from 0 to 2.72 million, "Collection" with 1 to 1.36 million, "Share" with 1 to 898 thousand, and "Comment" with 0 and 200 thousand. Subsequently, four best-performing models were ultimately confirmed through internal and external validation, all of which were RF models, including "Thumb-Up" (AUC = 0.8802), "Collection" (AUC = 0.7685), "Share" (AUC = 0.7872), "Comment" (AUC = 0.8077). Weight analysis identified the video duration, video description length, and shooting in department office emerged as the most three crucial parameters across all four models. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the significant impact of non-medical factors on the dissemination of medical science popularization videos, and shows that prediction models base on these factors can effectively forecast video spread and popularity. These findings may contribute to enhancing These findings, thereby advancing health education and strengthen public health literacy.

Indexed as

Information DisseminationMachine LearningVideo RecordingHumansPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning Modelshealth communicationmachine learningmedical science popularization short videosnon-medical factorsprediction models

Identifiers

PMID42827520
PMCPMC13630985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.