ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2026
Preliminary usability evaluation of a teleoperated humanoid robot for pediatric waiting-room observation: clinical and technical professionals' perspectives.
Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The field of assistive and social robotics is increasingly being applied within pediatric medicine, where waiting rooms provide an interesting setting for conducting ecological behavioral observations. Yet, there is a dearth of studies investigating teleoperated humanoid robots in their capacity as tools for naturalistic observation in an unstructured environment, a use that requires a very high level of user-friendliness of the robot for non-specialist users. In this study, the humanoid robot Alter-Ego was evaluated as a telepresence avatar to support remote observation in the waiting room of a child neuropsychiatry clinic. As a preliminary step toward future clinical evaluation, the study was conducted without the direct involvement of pediatric patients and focused on the usability, perceived cognitive workload, and acceptability of the platform among 13 professionals with clinical and technical backgrounds. The results demonstrated acceptable system usability, with an overall mean System Usability Scale score of 71.3. Regarding cognitive workload, the NASA-TLX identified Mental Demand and Effort as the most demanding dimensions, while Frustration levels remained low. The Godspeed Questionnaire revealed a highly positive perception of the platform's Animacy and Likeability, alongside good scores for Perceived Safety and Perceived Intelligence. In exploratory correlation analyses, no significant correlations were found between prior virtual reality (VR) or gaming experience and any of the outcome measures considered. In conclusion, the findings suggest that the Alter-Ego platform may be a usable and acceptable teleoperated tool for clinical and technical professionals, providing a basis for future evaluation in pediatric clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.