ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Divide or bridge? The heterogeneous effects of digital village participation on rural residents' happiness.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Enhancing rural residents' happiness is a key objective of China's rural revitalization strategy. Methods: Using data from the China Rural Revitalization Survey (CRRS), this study empirically examines the relationship between digital village participation on rural residents' happiness. Results: The results show that digital village participation is positively associated with rural residents' happiness. Dimensional-specific analyses further reveals that digital infrastructure, digital governance, and the digitalization of daily life exert significant positive effects on rural residents' happiness, whereas the effect of rural economic digitalization is statistically insignificant. The mechanism analysis indicates that digital village participation improves rural residents' happiness by alleviating credit constraints and increasing social interaction. The heterogeneity analysis reveals that rural residents with higher digital literacy are better able to translate digital participation into gains in happiness, whereas the effect is insignificant among those with lower levels of digital literacy. Discussion: This study provides empirical evidence for narrowing the rural digital divide and offers policy implications for promoting targeted and differentiated digital village development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.