ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Panic buying in response to tariffs: a psychodynamic and psychoanalytic hypothesis for economic uncertainty.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Panic buying, the sudden, affectively driven surge in purchasing essential goods in excess of rational need, has been widely documented during health crises but remains underexplored as a response to economic policies such as tariffs. Critically, panic buying must be distinguished from rational stockpiling: while anticipatory purchasing in response to tariff-induced price increases may reflect sound intertemporal decision-making, panic buying is characterized by purchases exceeding individually optimal levels and driven by negative affect, perceived scarcity, and social contagion rather than objective risk assessment alone. This article extends the integrated psychodynamic model of panic buying developed by Cooper and Gordon (1) to address tariff-induced consumer behavior, clarifying its psychological underpinnings and broader significance. The article examines how well-established frameworks from behavioral economics, including Prospect Theory, scarcity heuristics, and affect-based models, account for much of the surface phenomenology of tariff-induced panic buying, while arguing that psychodynamic mechanisms explain a clinically significant residual: namely, why a subset of individuals exhibits panic buying that is disproportionate to objective threat, resistant to rational persuasion, and recurrent across successive economic crises. The article introduces three core psychodynamic mechanisms operating across a five-phase model: (1) developmental vulnerability rooted in economic trauma; (2) threat activation involving projection and splitting; and (3) behavioral enactment via displacement and transitional object dynamics. Each mechanism is distinguished conceptually, linked to specific phases of the model, and operationalized with proposed measurement strategies. By providing a clinically actionable framework that complements existing behavioral and economic accounts, the analysis contributes to both therapeutic practice and public policy during periods of economic uncertainty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.