ArticleSurgical case reports2026
Successful Re-Closure with Adjunctive Retention Sutures for Fascial Dehiscence after Mesh-Mediated Fascial Traction in Open Abdomen Management for Perforated Sigmoid Diverticulitis: A Case Report.
Article in Surgical case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionOpen abdomen management (OAM) is sometimes required in patients with severe peritonitis and septic shock when primary fascial closure is unsafe or impossible. Mesh-mediated fascial traction (MMFT) combined with negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is a useful strategy for delayed fascial closure. However, fascial dehiscence may still occur after definitive closure in patients with multiple risk factors for impaired wound healing. Reports describing retention sutures as a salvage adjunct for fascial dehiscence after MMFT are scarce. We report a high-risk case in which re-closure with adjunctive retention sutures maintained abdominal wall closure after fascial dehiscence following staged closure. CASE PRESENTATION: A man in his 60s with obesity and ongoing corticosteroid therapy for interstitial pneumonia was transferred to our hospital with upper abdominal pain and profound septic shock. CT showed extraluminal gas predominantly in the upper abdomen and pelvic ascites, but the perforation site was unclear. Emergency exploratory laparotomy revealed perforated sigmoid diverticulitis. Because of severe hemodynamic instability, segmental sigmoid colectomy was performed, and OAM was initiated. After second-look surgery, primary fascial closure remained difficult because of marked bowel edema and obesity. MMFT combined with NPWT was therefore performed. The abdominal wall defect gradually decreased, and fascial closure was achieved on POD 13. However, fascial dehiscence occurred on POD 17, with the small intestine in direct contact with the fascial sutures. On POD 18, re-closure was performed using fascial re-suturing combined with 4 retention sutures. During closure, the fascia was gradually approximated toward the midline with manual lateral-to-medial compression of the trunk, and the skin was left open with continued NPWT. The patient was transferred for rehabilitation on POD 100. At 1-year follow-up, the wound was fully epithelialized, and no obvious incisional hernia was observed.
conclusionsFascial dehiscence may occur even after staged closure with MMFT and NPWT in high-risk patients. Adjunctive retention sutures may be a salvage option for re-closure when conventional fascial re-suturing alone is considered insufficient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.