Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42827444›Full record

ArticleSurgical case reports2026

Successful Re-Closure with Adjunctive Retention Sutures for Fascial Dehiscence after Mesh-Mediated Fascial Traction in Open Abdomen Management for Perforated Sigmoid Diverticulitis: A Case Report.

Tomohiro Takeda, Sato Nishida, Katsuro Enomoto, Daisuke Koro, Shoichiro Mizukami, Hiroyoshi Iwata, Masahide Otani, Mizuho Ohara, Chikayoshi Tani, Hiroyuki Takahashi and 4 more

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Tomohiro TakedaDivision of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan.
Sato NishidaDivision of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan.
Katsuro EnomotoDivision of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan.
Daisuke KoroDivision of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan.
Shoichiro MizukamiDivision of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan.
Hiroyoshi IwataDivision of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan.
Masahide OtaniDivision of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan.
Mizuho OharaDivision of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan.
Chikayoshi TaniDivision of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan.
Hiroyuki TakahashiDivision of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan.
Tatsuya ShonakaDivision of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan.
Koji ImaiDivision of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan.
Kimiharu HasegawaDivision of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan.
Hideki YokooDivision of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOpen abdomen management (OAM) is sometimes required in patients with severe peritonitis and septic shock when primary fascial closure is unsafe or impossible. Mesh-mediated fascial traction (MMFT) combined with negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is a useful strategy for delayed fascial closure. However, fascial dehiscence may still occur after definitive closure in patients with multiple risk factors for impaired wound healing. Reports describing retention sutures as a salvage adjunct for fascial dehiscence after MMFT are scarce. We report a high-risk case in which re-closure with adjunctive retention sutures maintained abdominal wall closure after fascial dehiscence following staged closure. CASE PRESENTATION: A man in his 60s with obesity and ongoing corticosteroid therapy for interstitial pneumonia was transferred to our hospital with upper abdominal pain and profound septic shock. CT showed extraluminal gas predominantly in the upper abdomen and pelvic ascites, but the perforation site was unclear. Emergency exploratory laparotomy revealed perforated sigmoid diverticulitis. Because of severe hemodynamic instability, segmental sigmoid colectomy was performed, and OAM was initiated. After second-look surgery, primary fascial closure remained difficult because of marked bowel edema and obesity. MMFT combined with NPWT was therefore performed. The abdominal wall defect gradually decreased, and fascial closure was achieved on POD 13. However, fascial dehiscence occurred on POD 17, with the small intestine in direct contact with the fascial sutures. On POD 18, re-closure was performed using fascial re-suturing combined with 4 retention sutures. During closure, the fascia was gradually approximated toward the midline with manual lateral-to-medial compression of the trunk, and the skin was left open with continued NPWT. The patient was transferred for rehabilitation on POD 100. At 1-year follow-up, the wound was fully epithelialized, and no obvious incisional hernia was observed.

conclusionsFascial dehiscence may occur even after staged closure with MMFT and NPWT in high-risk patients. Adjunctive retention sutures may be a salvage option for re-closure when conventional fascial re-suturing alone is considered insufficient.

Indexed as

abdominal wall dehiscenceadjunctive retention suturesdelayed fascial closuremesh-mediated fascial tractionopen abdomenseptic shocksigmoid diverticular perforation

Identifiers

PMID42827444
PMCPMC13630587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.