ArticleFrontiers in neurology2026
Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing penetrating needling and cognitive behavioral therapy for subjective tinnitus.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To describe the protocol for a randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of penetrating needling compared with cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in patients with subjective tinnitus. Methods: This protocol describes a proposed assessor- and analyst-blinded, parallel-group randomized controlled trial. A total of 72 participants will be randomized 1:1 to a treatment group receiving penetrating needling plus health education or a control group receiving CBT plus health education. Penetrating needling will be administered five times weekly for two consecutive weeks (10 sessions). The primary outcomes are the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI), the Tinnitus Questionnaire (TQ), and a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for tinnitus loudness. Secondary outcomes include the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD), and the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA). Outcomes will be assessed at baseline, after one week of treatment, after two weeks of treatment, and at a 4-week follow-up (by telephone, online, or in clinic). Conclusion: As CBT is an established standard of care, this proposed parallel-group trial is designed to specifically evaluate the efficacy of penetrating needling. The findings of this protocol are expected to provide rigorous, high-quality evidence to determine the viability of penetrating needling as a neuromodulatory alternative for subjective tinnitus. Clinical trial registration: http://itmctr.ccebtcm.org.cn/, ITMCTR2024000264.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.